Simulation Convergence Metrics¶
Numerical-quality checks for adaptive passes, mesh size, energy error, S-parameter convergence, and RAM use.
# |
VER ID |
Parameter |
Severity |
Design Rule / Constraint |
Ideal / Optimal Value |
Acceptable Range |
Good |
Bad |
Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
48 |
HFSS-V-001 |
Delta S Convergence (ΔS) |
Critical |
ΔS < 0.002 (max |S-matrix change| between passes) |
< 0.001 |
0.001 – 0.005 |
< 0.001: S-parameters converged to 3rd decimal place; Q-factor reliable to ±1% |
> 0.01: S-parameters still shifting; Q and coupling coefficients unreliable |
Primary HFSS convergence criterion. Maximum change in S-parameter matrix between successive adaptive mesh refinement passes. |
49 |
HFSS-V-002 |
Adaptive Pass Count |
Medium |
Converge within 6 – 15 adaptive passes |
6 – 12 passes |
6 – 25 passes |
6–12 passes: efficient meshing; geometry well-suited to HFSS basis functions |
> 40 passes without convergence: poorly conditioned geometry or material error; abort and review |
Number of mesh refinement iterations to reach ΔS criterion. Many passes indicates difficult geometry or incorrect material setup. |
50 |
HFSS-V-003 |
Mesh Element Count |
Medium |
10,000 – 500,000 tetrahedra for typical qubit geometry |
20k – 100k |
10k – 500k |
20k–100k: sufficient resolution for junction, pad, and resonator without excessive RAM |
> 1,000,000: direct solver RAM > 256 GB; iterative solver with lower accuracy required |
Total finite-element mesh size. Under-meshed → inaccurate fields; over-meshed → excessive compute cost and RAM. |
51 |
HFSS-V-004 |
Energy Error Δε/ε |
High |
Energy error < 0.5% (relative stored energy error) |
< 0.2 % |
0.2 – 1 % |
< 0.2%: field solution accurate; participation ratios and Q-factors reliable to < 1% |
> 2%: field solution inaccurate; EPR and loss calculations may be off by > 10% |
Relative error in total stored electromagnetic energy. Low energy error confirms accurate field solutions and Q-factor extraction. |
52 |
HFSS-V-005 |
Simulation RAM Usage |
Low |
Peak RAM < 64 GB for standard qubit simulation |
< 16 GB |
16 – 64 GB |
< 16 GB: fits standard workstation; direct solver; fastest and most accurate |
> 128 GB: requires HPC cluster; iterative solver fallback; convergence harder |
RAM required for direct matrix solver. Excess forces iterative solver with lower accuracy and convergence risk. |